Tuesday, August 11, 2009

David Newman: Professors Against Israel


Nearly eight years ago I wrote the following letter to Professor David Newman of the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Department of Politics and Government (excerpt):
November 7, 2001
it is interesting how you side with Degel Ha-Torah over NRP. you are willing to side with your arch-enemy (the religious) simply because they are “anti-zionist.” you insist on labeling the NRP..you leftist professors are such filth..please go back to your english speaking country!
Newman’s reply was:
i dont usually reply to hate male and incitement, but a small correction. I am a religious zionist who grew up in bnei akiva. i have a daughter in sherut leumi and two sons in yeshivot hesder and tichon. I have deep anger at the NRP for having surrendered their influence over rleigion in this country and letting the extremists take it over, because they were too involved in right wing politics. There are many tens of thousands disenchanted religious zionists who feel the same way. i am part of a family of over 120 olim, mostly religious, who contribute to this country by living here, working here and serving in crack army units. do you do any of these things or are you simply one more of these North american Jews, sitting at home in the USA, spending your life writing hate mail and inciting hatred? you may reply as you wish. I will not be bothering to read your message.
sincerely
david newman
Take note of his spelling and grammatical errors and keep in mind that he is a university professor! My response, which he didn’t reply to was:
Professor Newman,
You often profess that you are a religious Jew. However, your continual call for a Palestinian State is completely out of line with the Torah. Read Lech Lecha-Aza is clearly included in the territory that was given to Avraham, not to mention Hebron, where he he buried. That fact that you claim to be a Torah Jew is disgusting. No Torah Jew would express the anti-Zionist ideas you continually pollute the Post with. You are a want-to-be American, trying to import Western philosophy to a region that has its OWN heritage-one you should be proud of-a heritage that you should praise to your students, not vilify. To respond to your question-I am also an oleh, but one with a love for Israel, and not a leftist/Anglo hatred for my country (with surely you brought from Europe). You try to infest the rest of this Nation with the self-hatred of the Galut. Perhaps the time has come to be post-Ashkenazi-not post-Zionist. Stop using Judaism as a clever cover for your misguided political agenda. It is you who incite hatred in this country.
P.S. It would be wise to not ask questions in the text of a letter in which you, in the same letter, whine that you won’t read the others response!
When I wrote that email to him I knew I was onto something. Once again, years later my spider-sense in tingling. Newman now writes (August 2009):
It is never easy to be a diplomat representing a country in conflict. It is even more difficult to be an Israeli diplomat, especially in the post-1967 era, when the country’s international image has moved from being the weak, threatened, post-Holocaust nation to a mighty military power occupying the territory of another people and denying them the right to statehood and sovereignty.
The fact that Israel only continues to portray itself as the weak and threatened country, subject to continuous terror attacks and, more recently, a potential nuclear attack from Iran just doesn’t sell well when, at one and the same time, the government continues to undertake policies which negate many basic international standards of human rights for Palestinian civilians who are subject to its control.
Were Israel, as the strong power, to make real meaningful concessions on the issue of Palestinian statehood, the world would much more readily accept the very real security threats that the country faces and it would not be so antagonistic. But recent policies and statements by our leaders have sent a very different message to the world, and it is now our supporters and allies, not our enemies, who are criticizing us.
It is an irony that it was Richard Silverstein’s anti-Jewish blog that prompted me to look into Newman’s nonsense again after 8 years. It was probably that initial exchange that was the real beginning of Taming Korach. Now we are living under the threat of Iranian nuclear weapons-an Iran that has been the principle supporter of Hezbollah. Newman, like his American counterpart Silverstein uses a religious cover-a bluff-to weaken Israel’s position and attempt to incriminate the very nation he belongs to. Newman is the quintessential Hellenized Anglo Jew. He is “our” version of George Galloway-spending all of his time and energy plotting against Israel, meanwhile remaining oblivious to spiritual underpinnings of the Jewish presence in the Land of Israel.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I just discovered your website through some posts in JPost and I'm glad I did. I just read your article on David Newman. I am familiar with him as isracampus.org has consistently profiled him and his articles in JPost are always so self-serving. That's where I found your blogsite. I am a frequent talkbacker to JPost and YNet News and used to be at Haaretz but they stopped publishing me and it sickened me too much to continue. At any rate, I recently wrote a blog/article to JPost for a contributor contest (which I can no longer find on the home page but comments sent back to me via e-mail attest to the fact that it was published, just I don't know how to find it). The subject was "Self-loathing Jews", a particular interest of mine. Do you ever publish other peoples' blogs/articles. Would you be interested in reading what I have to say on the subject? I am a retired psychologist and, naturally, I look at the phenomenon from a psychological perspective. I'd be interested in hearing from you and keep up the excellent work.
Regards, Robert Haymond

Anonymous said...

Feel free to use any of my stuff you want. I keep a sort of blog, really an archive of email postings, at www.zioncon.blogspot.com

You raise an interesting point, and I will tell you my take on it. There is nothing in the Torah AGAINST using weapons in self-defense or against the enemies of Israel. To the contrary, it is obligatory in a wide range of circumstances, esp where it looks like it will succeed! The Torah has no patience for pacifism.

Today, web postings and other forms of media work are weapons. They can and should be used against the enemies of Israel. Political speech is not Lashon Hara. (Lashon Hara by the way is stating factually correct things that embarrass someone, not telling lies. Telling lies can sometimes also be permitted political speech.)

Or to put it differently: if it is mandatory to use a sword of gun in self-defense against an anti-Semite, then even use of something that ordinarily would count as Lashon Hara in some other context is both permitted and even morally mandatory. In any case, the use of Lashon Hara in order to prevent injury to other Jews is mandatory (Chafetz Hayim), not just permitted. And I do not think that political speech is Lashon Hara at all. Things that one would be prohibited from telling about one's neighbor or friend become mandatory exercises in political expression when it is about public figures.

For 2000 years Jews had no public figures about which political speech was needed and they did not participate in public discourse (except of course about religious issues). In the modern world, esp in Israel, participation in the politicla process is a moral (and maybe a religious) imperative. That participation consist largely of political speech.

Moreover, I do not regard Jewish anti-Semites to be Jews entitled to protection from Lashon Hara. They are enemies, like Korach (your blog's point) or Hellenists or collaborators with the Romans or collaborators with the Nazis or with the Soviets. I think Pinhas is the correct role model. Enemies should be dealt with as enemies. They may deserve to be shot or hanged, but doing so carries too high consequences for modern Pinhas figures. SO use of political speech and the media is the permitted and feasible alternative to shooting and hanging them.

Anyhow, I am hardly a Posek but that is my take on the question.

I think the best way of "cyber-shooting" the enemies of Israel, by the way, is to mock them. Esp the Jewish anti-Semites. They take themselves very seriously and so laughing at them and mocking them drives them nuts. Your own blog does a good job of mocking. They do not mind being called traitors and villains, and in fact love it. But make them look silly or ludiicrous and you give them an aneurism! Silverstein is an excellent example!

Here is an example of laughing at them:
Two States for Two Peoples-the Consensus Plan of the Left

Anonymous said...

I expect you to post it as a comment on your blog as it is your blogsite. In fact, you can edit it once I write it so it fits with your blogsite (in style) and return it to me for my approval. Nothing like a good editor.

As to the blogsite, I haven't read much beyond the David Newman piece as I just discovered it and it excited me (in a good way) but I plan to study it in detail. It is beautifully laid out, incidentally. The only (negative) criticism I have so far is that it was hard finding out how to reach you. Please make that more prominent.

Incidentally, the blogsite (or elsewhere) suggests you are a student. Where and what are you studying? And where do you come from? I am a retired (professional) psychologist who spends half the year in Edmonton (where I have family) and half the year in Israel (the winter, of course) with my other daughter and family who recently moved into the village (not settlement) of Tekoa.

Regards, Robert Haymond

P.S. I love your e-mail address. Indicates you have a real sense of humour.