Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Golden Calfer of the Year Award 5770 (2009): Richard Silverstein



    Today concluded Yom Kippur-The Day of Atonement in Israel and around the world.  Many people remember Yom Kippur for several historical events.  Firstly, the Yom Kippur War in 1973 marked the beginning of the war of attrition by Arabs against the State of Israel.  However, far fewer people know what happened on Yom Kippur 3321 years ago!  The Yom Kippur of 2449 was the day that Moses returned, the second time, from Mount Sinai*.  His delivery of the second set of tablets to the Jews signaled G-d's forgiveness of their sin of the golden calf.
    This year more or less concludes the first year of the Taming Korach blog.  Each year I hope to highlight one person-one of the mixed multitudes who has accidentally found his way into the Jewish nation.  The Golden Calfer of the Year is that special someone whose "membership" amongst the Jews tortures the rest of us.  After all, it was the incident of the golden calf that prevented the immortality of Israel**.
    It is no surprise to Taming's readership who this year's Golden Calfer of the Year Award goes to-Richard "The Dungeon Master" Silverstein."  Rich has the unique honor of having helped establish this site-a response to Jewish self-hatred and heresy.  I'd like to say thank you to the 5,000 new readers who have visited Taming Korach this year-to each of you a successful year.

Symbol of His Generation
    Why is Richard a shining example of the American Jewish "Baby Boomer" generation?  Rich tells us that he was an undergraduate in college in the 1970's.  He was and is affiliated with the American Conservative Movement.  He studied at Berkeley.  As his blog, Tikkun Olam indicates, he has a vision of "Judaism" that is more about social justice than about Torah.  So what's the difference?  Silverstein has posted numerous times through the years his (and his wife's) adventures to non-kosher restaurants.  About his wedding anniversary he wrote:
My wife discovered a wonderful new Seattle restaurant, Casuelita’s, which features Caribbean cuisine. She introduced me to it for our fifth wedding anniversary and it couldn’t have been a more wonderful anniversary present.
This non-kosher restaurant servers shrimp, pork, and all kinds of sea food (I called them).  Apparently Rich's Tikkun Olam ("Fixing The World" in Hebrew) doesn't extend to eating kosher or advertising kosher restaurants on his "Jewish" blog.  There are many Jews in his demographic who have similar habits-some are featured on my blog, but none are quite as hypocritical as Richard Silverstein.  He writes in a piece on the weekly Torah portion (Ekev):
It contains chilly admonitions to the Israelites about the curses that will befall them if they stray from the path God has chosen.
Well, do those admonitions not include eating non-kosher food and then recommending it around the world on a blog called "Tikkun Olam?"
    For those of you who have looked back on my initial argument's with him, it is readily apparent that Rich doesn't really understand Torah Judaism.  His version of Judaism is social justice, and only social justice.  What does "social justice Judaism" (Tikkun-keit) entail?  Here is Rich's feelings towards Orthodox Jews:
Also, I’ve felt profoundly alienated from Orthodox Jews because of their deep mistrust and intolerance of Jews who are less devout than they.
Let's examine this statement.  Rich is "alienated from Orthodox Jews."  This man has spent the past six or so years advertising non-kosher restaurants, persuading the world that Israel's presence in the West Bank is an "occupation," lashing out at Israeli settlers, condoning Arab violence against Jews, and trying to bring international condemnation upon Israel and his fellow Jews (among other transgressions).  Rich's following statement shows his utter contempt for Torah Jews and his mocking disobedience:
In another incident which would otherwise have been laughable had it not been so shocking, a small rump assembly of Orthodox rabbis excommunicated New Jewish Agenda members from Judaism because we supported gay and abortion rights. Afterward, I jokingly suggested that we start a Spinoza Society for those expelled from Judaism because of their beliefs. The motto I suggested: “Spinoza was right!”
    Richard Silverstein is a sad story from a sad generation.  There are those who realize that the only future of Jews who have replaced Judaism with the religion of social justice is Christianity.  These Jews have championed everyone's cause except their own.  Ironically they simply assimilate into the gentile world where they are finally silenced.  I dub Rich "The Dungeon Master" because he censors whatever information he doesn't like-particularly that which shows him to be a lying, conniving, treacherous, hateful, traitorous snake.  The connection between the social justice paganism that he and so many Jews of his generation advocate and Jewish assimilation into oblivion is a trend he refuses to recognize or even discuss.

Hatred Disguised As Harmony
    As the moderator of a blog that claims to "Make The World A Better Place," Richard Silverstein has a lot of venom to inject into his reader's psyche.  He is a small sample of what he has to say about his fellow Jews:
She’s the Chicken Little of university presidents.

...despite their deranged attitudes toward some of their fellow Jews

Israel never faces any consequences for its odious behavior or policies (like building this reprehensible fence)

Along with increasing successes of the BDS movement and other anti-Occupation activism, Israel’s impunity will end.

I quote long passages from the piece simply because of its undeniable power and the chilling message it presents to anyone who cherishes or values what the State of Israel might stand for if it ever lived up to its original promise to be a ‘light unto the nations.’

Because a brutal, callous and inhumane leader (as Netanyahu was and Sharon is) will show the worst face of Zionism.

If Barack Obama doesn’t maintain the same iron resolve and determination in pursuing his Middle East agenda, then all will be lost.  We must win against these evil people.  If we don’t, then Israel will eventually cease to exist as it currently does.

While it is true that I do not admire many Orthodox interpretations of Jewish law and practice (I am a Conservative Jew by practice), my grudge with such Jews lies in their political beliefs much more than in their religious ones.

Thus, Leviev has become the first financial victim of the BDS movement: the first Israeli company to suffer a substantial hit.  No doubt, he will not be the last.  This puts other Israeli companies which profit from the Occupation on notice that they are vulnerable.

Israel is now the cause of Jew hatred
my favorite quote is:
Why didn’t the good rabbi just close up shop and admit Judaism was irrelevant?
    What causes a person to spend years plotting against his fellow Jews?  Certainly his upbringing in the Conservative Movement has much to do with it.  I recently overheard a "Conservative Rabbi" speaking to a small group of people in Jerusalem as we waited for Shabbat dinner.  He was rattling on about his negative feeling towards the Orthodox establishment:  how they don't accept his "converts," how most Orthodox Jews, in his view, don't care about Jewish law, and how it bothers him that liberal Orthodox Rabbis don't have more authority in the Israeli bureaucracy.  These comments, along with his half-cocked understanding of the Torah, gave me a glimpse into how the conservative movement is "preparing its minnows for manhood."  Some of those minnows become angry confused sharks who spend their life's efforts trying to incriminate other Jews for loving (and following) their own tradition.  In that sense, Rich's teachers, among whom are Joel Roth of the Jewish Theological Seminary, are to blame for creating so many anti-Israel anti-Torah golems in a generation that has lost its connection with its religious heritage. 

Identity Crisis?
    After having sifted through some of Rich's "work," one common theme arose.  Rich's search for social justice, his self-described alienation from Orthodox Judaism, his obsessive liberalism, and his pluralism-and-any-cost politics together with the following statements he has made over the years has made me wonder if Richard Silverstein's war against the world's "right wing" isn't simply an internal war-an identity crisis manifesting itself as a leftist hate blog:
The Palmach boys were beautiful, young and pure.

Because of my alienation, I am somewhat impatient with the slow pace of acceptance of homosexuals within the Conservative movement.

Their sexuality is as loving, as committed and as meaningful as the sexuality of heterosexuals and therefore such homosexuality should be seen in an entirely different light than cultic sex.

You know nothing about homosexuality,...

I don't claim to know where Rich's heart lies, but the statements above along with his disdain for the Torah world and everything it represents certainly provides a clue. 

Conclusions
    It is especially in these past few weeks, and certainly throughout the year that a Jew takes an accounting of the soul.***  If there is someone who has encountered this blog and felt that I have given an unfair critique, I would certainly like to hear from you.  One of the only examples of this kind of accounting I have heared from Rich is:
Is the only way of being a Jew making aliya and studying in a yeshiva?
This shows the resentment and bewilderment of liberal Diaspora Jews towards Israel and Orthodoxy.  It is it Israel's fault for being Israel?  Is it the Torah Jew's fault for struggling with G-d?  Silverstein hasn't spent enough time struggling with himself.  In the following quote, again from his own blog, Richard slings the mud:
Really, Tom, is this the best you can do? It seems that long ago he started phoning it in and this story is a prime example: smug, self-serving, simplistic.
Smug, self-serving, simplistic are self-defining words for the Golden Calfer of the Year.  A one-dimensional virtual demagogue, Richard Silverstein has a single mode-that of a secular European Diaspora Jew.  He understands neither Torah Judaism nor non-Ashkenazi (Sephardic or Mizrachi) Jews.  He doesn't understand the Arabs he claims to champion because they have no idea what "social justice" is, nor would they care if you could manage to explain it to them.  Let's hope this one-note piped piper runs out of breath before he lures more naive people into his vengeful war against Jewish Israel.
_____________________________________________________________
*Rashi Exodus 18:13
**Bavli Avodah Zarah 5a
***חשבון נפש

22 comments:

Anonymous said...

Anything to do with this guy is just too negative. I'd say to you, the best revenge is enjoying your own way of life and doing good.

Justin White said...

Understood..I think you are right, at least in part. I was talking to a Rav about it on Yom Kippur. I feel that if I didn't start answering these people I myself wouldn't understand Judaism. The heretical "branches" of Judaism blur the distinction between fact and fallacy. I think it's important for Torah Jews to explain our side of things. Christians, Muslims, and other Jews have for too long been pumping false info about Judaism/Israel into the general consciousness. When Jews are campaigning to have other Jews dragged out of their houses, that's were the rest of us have to speak up! Thanks for the positive feedback, though and have a great year!

Anonymous said...

have a look at
http://kapodickie.blogspot.com/2009/09/peek-into-mind-of-richard-silverstein.html

Anonymous said...

Actually, I have a slightly different take. Dickie adores Nazi Norman Finkelstein and is simply trying to mimick Finkelstein's writing style - which consists of tossing infantile slurs and insults at anyone who does not agree with his own anti-Semitic agenda. Dickie is almost as vulgar as Finkelstein. But Norman does not make any pretense of promoting true Judaism, unlike the little Kapo from Seattle.

--- Sue

Justin White said...

Sue-well that's the aspect of Rich's blog that is most annoying and misleading. He is trying to make arguments from Judaism while advertising non-kosher restaurants at the same time! I don't think he even sees a contradiction in that. He was befuddled as to why I criticized the Conservative movement. He is living in an alternative (Jewish) reality!

Anonymous said...

Wow, quite the rant. Can I ask what your intentions are? Are you attempting to change Richard’s view, or the world’s view of Richard? Or is this just an outlet for people who annoy you?

-mark

Justin White said...

Mark,

I initially wrote him an email criticizing (harshly) his use of ideas within Judaism as a method to attack the settler movement in Israel. I don't think that someone with his background and commitment to his point of view can be brought back to the light. However, he was taking a lot of pot shots at me and then censoring my responses. Check out the section http://www.asdl.biz/2008/10/taking-back-our-religion.html which contains the actual dialogue between me and him. I didn't know at that time how twisted/committed he is in his anti-Israel campaign. He and others are putting a lot of lies and venom out there. I am getting about 100 unique hits a month-people are getting the antidote to these kind of pernicious attacks on Israel. One of the principles I list from Jewish sources is that it is a requirement to respond to Jewish heretics when they sling mud at the Torah.

Anonymous said...

Well, It’s my belief that your article comes across as a personal attack. For many people (such as myself) the benefits of your position and arguments are negated by the personal attacks because it gives a sense that your position can’t stand on its own merit (which I’m sure isn’t true). This amounts much more to a flame war, rather than an intellectual discussion.

A better approach (IMO) would be something like “In Richard Silverstein’s blog entry dated xxx, he incorrectly states blah” or “I believe Richard is misguided in believing yyy”

I think pointing out that Richard is a hypocrite by attacking him and his wife’s eating habits will cause others to think you have a vendetta, rather than a well formulated opinion. The fact that you are calling up restaurants he visited makes you a stalker, not a truth-teller.

If I post a blog saying “Justin is a poopy-head” do you think that you will gain a lot of educated favor by responding with “No Mark is a poopy-head, and I can prove it cuz I called his mother.” ???

-mark

Justin White said...

Mark,

Part of the reason you feel that way is because you are writing from the perspective of a non-Jew, and that is fine and dandy-no prob. However, if you and your brother had a tiff about something and you were discussing it with your folks, it would be a different scenario than if you have a disagreement with your neighbor. Jews are connected to one another, and most of the commandments in the Torah are between Jews, not necessarily pertaining to the non-Jewish world. My "personal attacks" are in response to his statements. He is a persistent person, and so am I. One of the reasons why I started the blog was so that I myself could sift through and understand the nature of non-Orthodox "Judaism" and I have to say that this blog has really educated me about that world!

As far as the restaurant business is concerned, I think you are confused by that because you are not aware of the "rules" regarding kashrut and about encouraging other Jews to violate that laws of the Torah. In fact, Jesus was excommunicated by the Jewish community for doing exactly what Richard and his friends are doing-inciting other Jews against the Torah and the Orthodox establishment. As a non-Jew, I don't blame you for feeling/commenting like you do. I am simply explaining a different side of the argument. As you can see I don't censor others opinions on this blog, which is something that the "liberals" cannot attest to.

Silverstein went on the net and was giving my personal info on his site-it's still there. Don't give me this stalker business, because he posts this info on separate articles on his blog. Reading info on someone's blog is not stalking-otherwise you would be a stalker for reading my blog!

Anonymous said...

I happen to believe that some people are deeply in need of being targets of personal attacks! And also a good swift hickory switch!

--- Sue

Anonymous said...

Well if you take Silverstein’s IQ, multiply it by 10, you still have a number less than Dersh’s IQ.

Talk about the dung beetle attacking the elephant…

Justin White said...

Someone left this anonymous message:
________________________________
Let's rid the US of kikes and mud people and make way for the Aryan race!

--- Richard Silverstein
________________________________
One of the reasons why I started Taming was for reasons of censorship. However, being that I myself am both "kike" and "mud people" it seems a bit insensitive to make such comments. As much as Silverstein is a weasel, I doubt he was the one who wrote this!

I was once explaining to an Israeli Rabbi about this neo-Nazi in the USA. When I said his name was David Duke, the Rabbi smiled and stared at me. I think he realized that being called "David" was actually a tribute to Jews.

Anonymous said...

You are correct, I am a non-Jew. However, if my brother and I had an argument, and say I knew he slept with prostitutes, I wouldn’t post this fact so the entire Internet would have access to it. I certainly wouldn’t call the suspected whore to confirm my suspicions. Maybe Jewish brothers are different in this regard.

As for Jesus, a different view (not necessarily any more accurate) on that subject was that Jesus was pointing out the corruption and greed surrounding the religious establishment of that time. The present Catholic response to opposition, not unlike the Orthodox Jews at that time, is to attack, discredit, or even payoff those with grievances against the church. Ironically, the Catholic establishment has become the very thing their divine leader fought against.

Bottom line, I am all about open discussion of ideas. What Richard did (censoring you) is IMO wrong. However, I believe you have lowered yourself to compete with him at his level. You are a very smart person, perhaps you should consider working on advocating your position or beliefs rather than childish banter with someone who will “never see the light”?

-mark

Justin White said...

Mark,

Maybe Jewish brothers...
Jews have been sitting on the bench, in exile, for 2,000. Now that we are getting back-in-the-saddle, there are heretics amongst us who want to derail our return. Furthermore, there is a prohibition called "moser" מוסר that prohibits a Jew from:

1. giving over a Jew to non-Jews
2. giving over a Jew's possessions to non-Jews
3. giving over the Land of Israel to non-Jews

The penalty for such transgressions is death (source-Rambam). What he is suggesting, that the Land of Israel is "occupied" by Jews, is absurd. He is pursuing a direction that is forbidden by the Torah-a source he obviously doesn't care about.

As for Jesus, a different view...
You are quoting a perspective from the Christian world. In reality, "Jesus" lived some 150 years before the destruction of the Temple-before when the Christian world "says" he lived. Furthermore, he was excommunicated for idolatry (worshiping objects) and witchcraft. Jewish scriptures never talk about him interacting with the Temple in any way. In fact, the period were he got in trouble was when he was in exile in Egypt with his teacher, running from King Yannai. See the following for more info:
http://www.asdl.biz/2009/08/battle-with-missionary-paul-cohen-round_31.html

I believe you have lowered yourself...
I'll point out that it was my comments that were brought out into the open-he published them and then tried to mock me at the same time. In fact, according to the Talmud, the Temple was destroyed because one Jew (Bar Kamsa) was insulted by another, and Bar Kamsa got revenge by going to the Romans. The Talmud says that Bar Kamsa should have been executed. I have posted the excerpt at the bottom.

I am providing a forum to combat these people who claim to be liberals, but in fact are far from liberal. Another issue is that if I had not stumbled across his site, I would have never really have understood the mentality of people like him. It really is just another learning experience.

Justin White said...

Talmud Bavli Gittin 55b-56a

The destruction of Jerusalem came through a Kamza and a Bar Kamza;27 the destruction of Tur Malka28 came through a cock and a hen; the destruction of Bethar came through the shaft of a leather. The destruction of Jerusalem came through a Kamza and a Bar Kamza in this way. A certain man had a friend Kamza and an enemy Bar Kamza. He once made a party and said to his servant, Go and bring Kamza. The man went and brought Bar Kamza. When the man [who gave the party] found him there he said, See, you tell tales about me; what are you doing here? Get out. Said the other: Since I am here, let me stay, and I will pay you for whatever I eat and drink. He said, I won't. Then let me give you half the cost of the party. No, said the other. Then let me pay for the whole party. He still said, No, and he took him by the hand and put him out. Said the other, Since the Rabbis were sitting there and did not stop him, this shows that they agreed with him. I will go and inform against then, to the Government. He went and said to the Emperor, The Jews are rebelling against you. He said, How can I tell? He said to him: Send them an offering and see whether they will offer it [on the altar]. So he sent with him a fine calf.1 While on the way he made a blemish on its upper lip, or as some say on the white of its eye, in a place where we [Jews] count it a blemish but they do not. The Rabbis were inclined to offer it in order not to offend the Government. Said R. Zechariah b. Abkulas to them: People will say that blemished animals are offered on the altar. They then proposed to kill Bar Kamza so that he should not go and inform against them, but R. Zechariah b. Abkulas said to them, Is one who makes a blemish on consecrated animals to be put to death? R. Johanan thereupon remarked: Through the scrupulousness2 of R. Zechariah b. Abkulas our House has been destroyed, our Temple burnt and we ourselves exiled from our land.3
_____________________
(27) Lit., ‘locust and son of locust’. The meaning is that a very trivial cause set in motion the train of events which led to the destruction of Jerusalem; and similarly with the slaughter which accompanied and followed the war of Bar Cochba.
(28) [‘The Mountain of the King’. V. Pseudo-Jonathan, Judges IV, 5, where Mt. Ephraim is rendered by Tur Malka. According to Horowitz, Palestine, p. 240, it denotes the whole mountainous region stretching from the Valley of Jezreel to the south of Judah, including the mountains of Samaria, known also by the Hebrew name Har ha-Melek. (V. also Buchler, JQR, XVI, pp. 180ff.) There is still some uncertainty whence this name was derived. Was it perhaps because this region lay within the great conquests of John Hyrcanus that it was given the name? v. p. 77a n. 3a. The destruction of Tur Malka is placed by Buchler, op. cit. p. 186ff. during the war 66-70].
_______
(1) Lit., ‘a third calf’. (a) Reached a third of its growth, (b) the third-born, (c) in its third year.
(2) Lit., ‘the humility’.
(3) [V. Josephus, Wars, II, 17, 2, who ascribes the beginning of the war to the refusal to accept the offering of the Emperor in 66 C.E.]

Anonymous said...

I don’t think I said reading his blog was stalking, reading about his wedding, then following up on his choice of restaurants is.

He stalked you, so your defense is to stalk him back? Sounds like a strange (and bad) tactic to me.

-mark

Justin White said...

Mark,

All the info I posted came from articles on his blog! If you don't believe this then go to his blog:
www.richardsilverstein.com

The fact is that he refused to publish the address of my blog, but I cite him. I don't see anything wrong with quoting information that he has willingly publish on his own site-you want to explain that to me? He published many articles listing non-kosher restaurants on a site that is supposed to "fix the world" with Judaism! I won't back down on this point.

Silverstein responded to emails that I initially wrote him. I have to compliment him on not being a coward, unlike others, and publishing his identity. I simply complain that he censors other people's comments, which is a cowardly thing to do!

Anonymous said...

On Dickie's blog he is now whining that Jewish Federation of Seattle did not give him equal time to SUPPORT Iran in their anti-Iran conference. Really

Anonymous said...

Well, I’ll bow out. I’m not going to get into historical fights based on interpretations of books written thousands of years ago by people with agendas. It makes perfect since that Jews would capture history in a manner favorable to Jews, [what would later be Christians] capture it in what is favorable to them. I question any “facts” that are more than a few hundred years old, and I question many facts thereafter.

I’m happy for you, you were in a dark time here in the states, you found a calling that caused an upbeat dedication and effort in you. When we had a discussion 20-some years ago, you were die-hard atheist. You stated that you wouldn’t let any child of yours join a religion ever. Agnostic then, as I am now, I tried to convey that I believe religion can have benefits. You disagreed heavily at the time.

Religion can have a dark side, as it has the potential to save people from the brink of self-destructive tendencies, it also has the potential to create zealots who are so devote in a prescribed way of thinking they are adamant about prescribing it to everyone else. To me this is dangerous, as it causes muslims to blow themselves up, Christians to institute genocide on half the planet, and jews to kill their own.

One has to question, if God is omnipotent, and all powerful, does he really need your assistance in defending him? Is your ego really so large that you believe you can defend his word better than he can?

If these gods want their people to act in these ways, trust me I want no part with them.

-mark

Justin White said...

people with agendas
The fact is that there is one truth, and with regards to "Jesus" he either was this or was that. In my opinion not disagreeing with the Christian interpretation is basically agreeing with them-that is the "majority opinion" these days.

you were die-hard atheist. You stated that you wouldn’t let any child of yours join a religion ever
You have a better memory than I! I do remember having a discussion with you about religion. However, the only "religion" I was ever exposed to was Christianity, and I hold by my apparent statement. I'll let you know that Judaism was originally a response to idolatry. The Torah is called a "spice," which is the cure for the "evil inclination," or the desire to do wrong. I'm not sure I would call Judaism a religion, because it has a specific aim. In any case, someone who is born from a Jewish mother is a Jew whether they like it or not.

When I was about 15, roughly 20 years ago I decided to go to university to study physics. I had no other intention other than to understand the big picture. I have never assumed that "G-d didn't exist," I contend that my only interest in studying academic subjects was spiritual. As proof, not so long after I went to yeshiva to study Judaism.

it also has the potential to create zealots
The Nazi regime was a secular one. I often point that out to secularists, but to no avail. Communism was by definition atheist and look that the Soviets and North Korea! This is a frail argument in my opinion, but does have some merit. Maimonides, a famous Rabbi from 1,000 years ago said that the definition of evil is extremism. So, secularism can also have a dark side!

if God is omnipotent, and all powerful, does he really need your assistance in defending him? Is your ego really so large that you believe you can defend his word better than he can?
I wouldn't say I am "defending" G-d, however the prophet Elijah made the well-known statement:

And Elijah came to all the people, and said, How long will you hobble between two opinions? If the Lord is God, follow him; but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word.
Kings 1 (18:21)


Apparently He does want us to "defend His position." However, I think you have a different view of religion-Biblical is not Jewish. Belief in a certain power leads to a certain kind of behavior. That is the problem Abraham had when he confronted the idolater/dictator Nimrod. Abraham, who believed in one G-d was persecuted by someone who, by "today's standards" was quite evil. Those standards have come into place because of Abraham and his spiritual descendants. Your concept of right and wrong is heavily influence by Judaism. When Jews first came to Israel, the Canaanites would burn their children alive as part of a "religious" ritual! Times have changed-I think for the better.

In any case, I feel that by opening up the discussion, I am learning from people like yourself. I feel my blog is more "liberal" than others who make similar claims.

Anonymous said...

Silverstein broke - begging for money. See
http://kapodickie.blogspot.com/2009/10/silverstein-panhandles-his-readers-for.html

Wait till he loses in court to Rachel Neuwirth!

Justin White said...

I am actually from the D.C. area and unfortunately I won't be there to confront "Dickie" and his boyfriend Haber. If any one you know who Haber actually is, please let me know. By the way, what name to you go by "kapodickie.blogspot.com?"